Join The Conversation With Mishpacha's Weekly Newsletter

Mitzvos before Matan Torah

Yoram Bogacz

We often find in Torah sources the notion that the nation’s forefathers — Avraham, Yitzchak and Yaakov — observed the entire Torah, even though they lived before the Torah was given to the Jewish people at Har Sinai. This has given rise to a vast rabbinic literature that interprets and clarifies various passages in the Torah in light of this principle, and addresses what appear to be counterexamples to it. In this article, we will clarify the concept of Torah observance in the pre-Matan Torah era.

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

concept of har sinai with wordsWe begin by noting that there are indications in the Written Torah that at least some commandments were observed in pre-Torah generations. Consider the mitzvah of yibum, or levirate marriage. The Torah relates that when Yehudah’s son, Eir, died, Yehudah instructed Eir’s brother, Onan, to marry the widow. In describing this event, the Torah uses the word yibum that later appears in the Torah as a commandment. Ramban writes that the sages of those times were aware of the enormous spiritual benefit of levirate marriage. He describes this practice as a custom (minhag). Others write that levirate marriage is one of the commandments that were incumbent on Noachides before the Torah was given.

The Talmud states that Avraham observed the Torah, as alluded to in Hashem’s statement that Avraham observed “My safeguards, My commandments, My decrees, and My Torahs.” With respect to Yaakov, too,  the Sages state  that he observed the entire Torah, as  hinted to in the phrase “I dwelled with Laban” (Bereishis 32:5), with the Hebrew word for “dwelled” (גרתי) forming  an anagram of 613 (תרי"ג) that  evokes  the 613 commandments. Virtaully all commentators accept that Yitzchak also observed the commandments. On this basis, they  question  certain acts of  Yitzchak  that seem  to have violated Torah law, such as partaking of  meat  that was  slaughtered by his son Esau, who  was an apostate and thus unfit to  perform kosher slaughter.

We further find that the principle of Torah observance is extended to the Matriarchs of the Jewish people. For example, the Torah relates  that after the birth of Yitzchak, Sarah rejoiced in  becoming able to once again nurse children. The Sages, prompted by the Torah’s use of the plural form children, as opposed to child, explain that there were skeptics who scoffed at the claim that the aged Sarah had given birth to Yitzchak. To prove them wrong, Sarah nursed other women’s babies who were present at the celebratory feast when Yitzchak was weaned. Several commentators note that this is an apparent violation of the halachah forbidding a Jewish woman to nurse gentile children.  This question presupposes that Sarah observed the commandments of the Torah.

We find, as well, that Yaakov’s sons are presumed to have observed Torah law. Thus, the Torah states that in preparation for Yosef’s meal with his brothers, he instructed that an animal be slaughtered, and the Gemara explains that Yosef instructed that his brothers be shown that the slaughter was done in keeping with halachah. Between the generation of Yosef and the giving of the Torah, we find that the classical authorities question the propriety of the marriage of Moshe’s father, Amram, to his aunt, Yocheved,  indicating a presumption that Amram observed the Torah.

The classical commentaries also discuss the Torah observance of a number of people who were outside the line of descent stretching from Avraham to Moshe. For example, they question whether Adam and Malkitzedek observed the Torah.  Interestingly, we find statements in the commentaries clarifying who did not observe the Torah. Thus, at least one commentator argues that Lot, Avraham’s nephew, did not observe the commandments.

In summary, there is a consensus among commentators that from the time of Avraham until the Torah was given, there was at least a small core of people within the Jewish nation who observed the commandments. Mishneh LaMelech writes that it consisted of the Avos, Yaakov’s sons, and perhaps Eliezer, Avraham’s servant, while the Netziv writes that it consisted of the leaders of the nation, but that the masses did not observe the commandments. At any rate, it seems that the principle of Torah observance applies at least to Avraham and Sarah; Yitzchak and Rivkah; Yaakov, Leah, and Rochel; Yaakov’s sons; and Amram.

Still, it must be stressed that consensus is not the same as unanimity. Thus, there are commentators who argue that only the Avos — Avraham, Yitzchak, and Yaakov — observed the Torah, and yet others go so far as to say that only Avraham observed the entirety of the Torah.

Share this page with a friend. Fill in the information below, and we'll email your friend a link to this page on your behalf.

Your name
Your email address
You friend's name
Your friend's email address
Please type the characters you see in the image into the box provided.
CAPTCHA
Message
MM217
 
Locked Up for Saving Lives
Rabbi Moshe Grylak Kidney-shaped kindness
Selling a Defective Product
Yonoson Rosenblum To play or not to play
Out of the Booth of Truth
Eytan Kobre “Entries into and exits from the succah”
Take 5: Business Tips from Peloton COO Tom Cortese
Prepared for print by Shira Isenberg Invigorate a “sleepy industry” with innovation
Ten Questions for Shmuel Bisk
Rachel Bachrach A good mortgage broker can save you NIS 100,000
That Elusive Mr. Right
Jacob L. Freedman “I’m calling because you got it all wrong!”
Home Front Command
Rabbi Ron Yitzchok Eisenman Another victim of Hurricane Harvey
Say What?
Faigy Peritzman The language of the heart
The Business of Marriage
Sarah Chana Radcliffe Don’t squelch your spouse’s financial dreams
The Pastry Chef: Part II
D. Himy, M.S. CCC-SLP And Zivia Reischer Red thoughts, green thoughts