Join The Conversation With Mishpacha's Weekly Newsletter



Running for Cover

Rachel Ginsberg

What draws hundreds of women — whose black, head-to-toe cloaks seem to be popping up like mushrooms over the Jerusalem landscape — to embark on an extreme journey of super-modesty, reminiscent of the Muslim women of Afghanistan and North Africa? Some call it a cult. But these women say they’re simply reclaiming the ancient holy standards of history’s righteous women.

Wednesday, August 21, 2013

If you haven’t actually seen the women on the streets of Jerusalemor Beit Shemesh covered from head to toe with a blanket-like cloak for the sake of tzniyus, you’ve surely heard about this “cult” and its accompanying fanatical behaviors. You’ve undoubtedly learned that these “burka ladies” — who wear several layers of clothing, topped with total body and face coverings resembling the burka garment worn by many Muslim women in the Middle East, Afghanistan, and North Africa — have gone off the deep end regarding modesty issues. You’ve read that they don’t allow their husbands in the house at night until their daughters are sleeping, that they don’t bathe more than once a week, they don’t nurse their babies, they don’t seek medical attention or go to hospitals even if their or their children’s lives are in danger, they force their young daughters to dress like them, and they permit polygamous marriages and incorporate a list of other deviant practices in blatant contravention of halachah and traditional Jewish practice.

What, then, has drawn hundreds of women in what the Israeli media call the “Shal cult” (“shal” is the Yerushalmi-Yiddish term for the shawl wrap women traditionally wore until the turn of the last century, which has made a big-time comeback) — whose black cloaks seem to be popping up like mushrooms over the Jerusalem landscape — to embark on this extreme journey of super-modesty? Speak to a random sampling of them (the layers of coverings make them look intimidating and unapproachable to the outsider, but underneath they’re pretty much regular women) and they’ll tell you three things: they don’t belong to a “cult”; they are being unfairly libeled and persecuted by a close-minded public and a gossip-hungry media who have latched onto their “otherness” as an excuse for sensationalized reporting; and, barring some extreme deviations by unstable individuals, most of the accusations against them as a group are unfounded. They will also tell you that they have reclaimed the modesty standards of past generations that fell away with the impurity of modern society, standards that will, G-d willing, help push forward the final Redemption — pointing to pictures of Jerusalemites of the last century and of their own ancestors, and invoking Talmudic and halachic dictums regarding the ideal standards of tzniyus.

They discount the well-publicized proclamation of the Eidah HaChareidis, which condemns “a group of women who have uprooted daas Torah … who don’t send their children to proper schools, who don’t give them medical treatment even if their lives are in danger, and who have instituted unmentionable practices regarding marriages, etc.…” The Badatz convened and issued this public condemnation because of accumulated reports involving cases of perverted behavior among adherents of the “cult.” Yet a closer reading of the text does not refer to their controversial mode of dress per se, although privately these rabbanim have had to mediate situations where wives have insisted on taking on extreme modesty stringencies against the wishes, and to the embarrassment, of their husbands.

In fact, these women point to another proclamation from 2001 — signed by Rav Yisrael Yaakov Fisher, Rav Moshe Halberstam, Rav Meir Bransdorfer and others, praising the resurrection of the shal, an additional wrap over clothing that hides a woman’s form. These three great poskim of Yerushalayim are no longer alive today. Yet what would they have said about the more conspicuous, mysterious-looking, head-to-toe, slit-eye “burka”?

That’s not the only question the additional layers inspire. Does this movement have rabbinic oversight, or are the new customs self-interpreted?  Is the “cover-up” a sign of authentic modesty, or a rejection of rabbinic consensus? Can conspicuousness and modesty live in harmony? And does such an external hiddur pose a threat of self-delusion?

 

To read the rest of this story, please buy this issue of Mishpacha or sign up for a weekly subscription.

Share this page with a friend. Fill in the information below, and we'll email your friend a link to this page on your behalf.

Your name
Your email address
You friend's name
Your friend's email address
Please type the characters you see in the image into the box provided.
CAPTCHA
Message


MM217
 
A Century of Horror — and Hope
Rabbi Moshe Grylak More connected than at first glance
Sundown
Eytan Kobre When Chazal say so, that eclipses all else
Great Expectations
Jacob L. Freedman Not just his personal nachas machine
Vote of Thanks
Rabbi Ron Yitzchok Eisenman Dov Ber was using Hashem as an excuse
Today’s Trash
Faigy Peritzman “Guess what I did today!”
Navigating In-Lawing
Sarah Chana Radcliffe Nurturing this relationship with kindness, consideration...
From Humdrum to Happy
Rebbetzin Aviva Feiner The challenge: infusing these days with joy!