Join The Conversation With Mishpacha's Weekly Newsletter



Disorder in The Court

Shimmy Blum

It is a very rare occurrence in America — where the separation of church and state is enshrined in the Constitution — that religious theology should become a hotly debated political issue. However, many tenets of Islam’s sharia law system clash with US and Western law, and the intent of some Islamists to insinuate sharia into the American justice system has set off amber warning lights among intelligence and legal experts, who sense a new, insidious threat to the American way.

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

On the heels of the Ground Zero Mosque controversy that attracted national and even international attention, voters in the state of Oklahoma passed a controversial referendum on Election Day. The “Save our State” initiative, approved by 70 percent of Oklahoma voters, amends the state constitution to prohibits state courts from recognizing sharia — Islamic law — as legitimate and factoring it into laws or court decisions. Less than a week later, a judge issued an injunction against implementing the ballot results in response to a lawsuit brought by Muneer Awad, head of the Oklahoma chapter of the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR). A national debate on sharia’s place in American society was thus opened even wider, with no sign of it subsiding anytime soon.

Most of America’s mainstream political, academic, and media establishment have been dismissive of the notion that American Muslims, who comprise only approximately 2 percent of the population, will in any way threaten other Americans with their adherence to their religion’s sacred law. Prominent Jewish journalist Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic wrote, “A Martian takeover of New Jersey is more likely than the imposition of a caliphate, or of Muslim law, on America.”

Countering the prevalent passive attitude in the face of the spread of sharia — as the Muslim population and political clout grow in the US — is a growing chorus of sharia critics. Among the most influential sections of that chorus are the authors of the recently released book, Shariah: The Threat to America. The book was published by a team of respected national security and intelligence experts, including former military and government officials, as well as a host of other analysts.

The authors refer to themselves as “Team B,” a moniker that hearkens back to a group of experts who reported to the CIA in the 1970s that the Soviet threat was far greater than was generally believed.

Last week, Mishpacha attended a Manhattan conference hosted by Hamilton Strategies, where some of the book’s key authors laid out their view of the impending popularization of sharia law. The lecturers included: Frank Gaffney, former assistant secretary of defense for international security policy and current president of the Center for Security Policy (CSP); Andrew McCarthy, former assistant US attorney for New York; Patrick Poole, consultant to military and law enforcement authorities on antiterrorism issues; and prominent attorney David Yerushalmi, who serves as the general counsel to the CSP and senior legal advisor for policy affairs to the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies (IASPS).

At first glance, it appears that sharia’s tenets are aimed solely at running the lives of Muslims. However, some team members warned that it is the tenet of imposing Islamic will upon non-Muslims that represents sharia’s greatest threat to the fundamental Western principle of the people’s right to self-governance.

“An internal 1991 memo from the Egypt-based Muslim Brotherhood organization that has been discovered spoke of a ‘grand jihad’ aimed at the destruction of Western civilized society by internal sabotage,” said Andrew McCarthy, who successfully prosecuted Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman for his role in the 1993 World Trade Center attempted bombing. “The values of those whose goal is a sharia state, even the moderates, are contradictory to our values of freedom. They reject equality between men and women and Muslims and non-Muslim, and the principle that all political disputes must be solved nonviolently.”

McCarthy relates that during his prosecution of Sheikh Rahman for the first World Trade Center bombing, several moderate American Muslims offered to help translate his incendiary speeches into English in order to assist the prosecution. However, when he wasn’t able to guarantee that their identities would never be publicized, they declined the work, out of fear of being ostracized by their communities and their conservative clergy as apostates to sharia. At his trial, Rahman himself tried (unsuccessfully) to justify his approval of his followers’ terrorist activities by declaring that he was simply following the tenets of sharia.

 

To read the rest of this story, please buy this issue of Mishpacha or sign up for a weekly subscription.

Share this page with a friend. Fill in the information below, and we'll email your friend a link to this page on your behalf.

Your name
Your email address
You friend's name
Your friend's email address
Please type the characters you see in the image into the box provided.
CAPTCHA
Message


MM217
 
The Fortunes of War
Rabbi Moshe Grylak We’re still feeling the fallout of the First World War
Some Lessons, But Few Portents
Yonoson Rosenblum What the midterms tell us about 2020
Vote of Confidence
Eyan Kobre Why I tuned in to the liberal radio station
5 out of 10
Rabbi Dovid Bashevkin Top 5 Moments of the Kinus
Day in the Life
Rachel Bachrach Chaim White of KC Kosher Co-op
When Less is More
Rabbi Ron Yitzchok Eisenman How a good edit enhances a manuscript
It’s My Job
Jacob L. Freedman “Will you force me to take meds?”
They’re Still Playing My Song?
Riki Goldstein Yitzy Bald’s Yerav Na
Yisroel Werdyger Can’t Stop Singing
Riki Goldstein Ahrele Samet’s Loi Luni
Double Chords of Hope
Riki Goldstein You never know how far your music can go
Will Dedi Have the Last Laugh?
Dovid N. Golding Dedi and Ding go way back
Battle of the Budge
Faigy Peritzman Using stubbornness to grow in ruchniyus
The Challenging Child
Sarah Chana Radcliffe Strategies for raising the difficult child
Bucking the Trend
Sara Eisemann If I skip sem, will I get a good shidduch?
The Musician: Part 1
D. Himy, M.S. CCC-SLP and Zivia Reischer "If she can't read she'll be handicapped for life!"