Join The Conversation With Mishpacha's Weekly Newsletter



Couture Conundrums: Must I Check Everything For Shatnez?

Rabbi Yirmiyohu Kaganoff

Every so often, we notice an alert posted by a shatnez agency, letting us know that an item that should not have a posed a shatnez concern actually contains shatnez. Does that mean that we can never buy a garment without checking it? Why can’t we rely on halachic concepts such as rov (majorities) to obviate the need to check any garment? An in-depth look at changing manufacturing processes answers these questions, and more.

Wednesday, February 02, 2011

“The importer told me that the garment was made from a blend of hemp and wool, which should involve no shatnez concern. As there was no authorized shatnez tester in town, I did what I thought was the next-best thing — I brought the garment to a local Torah-observant tailor to have him check it. He carefully checked the threads and guaranteed me that the garment contained no linen.

“Only after I wore the garment many times did I meet a great Torah scholar and mention this incident in passing. The talmid chacham told me that I should not be so certain, and he offered to compare the material in my garment to linen threads he had available. And indeed, it was clear that he was correct. The threads in my garment were made from wool and linen, not hemp, and I had been violating a Torah prohibition the entire time!”

Does this story sound contemporary and familiar? As a matter of fact, this story happened some twenty years before the single-lens microscope was invented in the Netherlands by Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

Set in 1650 in the city of Vilna, the “Jerusalem of Lithuania” and perhaps the largest bastion of Torah of all of Europe, this story is recorded in the commentary Beis Hillel to Yoreh Deiah. In those days, the only “scientific” means of checking whether a material was linen or hemp was to take a sample and see if a flame would get it to burn, since hemp is more flammable than linen (Rema, Yoreh Deiah 302:2), although others contested the reliability of this test (Piskei Teshuvah 302:1, quoting She’eilos U’Tshuvos Pnei Yehoshua).

Clearly, then, shatnez issues are not exclusively a result of modern manufacture. But technological and industrial advancement has certainly exacerbated this problem significantly, for shatnez can now be found in everything from sweaters and skirts to scarves, and from bedding and button-loops to baseball gloves.

A HAIRY ISSUE

Before delving into contemporary questions, we must first understand some details of the laws of shatnez.

The prohibition of shatnez exists only if the garment is made from a blend of sheep’s wool and linen. Wool of other species does not a shatnez problem pose. (The term “wool” is defined as hair that is soft and can be used as cloth.) Thus, material made of a mixture of linen with camel, rabbit, or goat hair is not shatnez (Mishnah Kilayim 9:1; see Rambam, Hilchos Kilayim 10:2).

The Mishnah (Kilayim 9:2) records that certain combinations, such as silk and wool, were prohibited because of maris ayin, since this raises suspicion or may be misinterpreted as someone wearing shatnez. The Rishonim conclude, however, that this concern exists only when the material that may be confused with wool or linen is not commonly available, but once people become familiar with its availability no prohibition of maris ayin exists (Rosh, Hilchos Kilayim, printed his halachos to Maseches Niddah).

Most people are surprised to discover that a garment made of a blend of linen and either mohair or cashmere is not shatnez. Why is this? Because neither mohair nor cashmere are made from sheep’s wool, but from the hair of goats! Mohair is processed from the hair of an Angora goat. Although goats of this variety are now raised around the world, they originated in Turkey. (The current capital of Turkey, Ankara, used to be called Angora.)

Cashmere is the wool of the Kashmir goat, which was originally native to central Asia, as its name indicates.

Therefore, if no sheep’s wool thread was mixed into the mohair or the cashmere, the existence of linen in the garment will not make it shatnez.

 

To read the rest of this story, please buy this issue of Mishpacha or sign up for a weekly subscription.

Share this page with a friend. Fill in the information below, and we'll email your friend a link to this page on your behalf.

Your name
Your email address
You friend's name
Your friend's email address
Please type the characters you see in the image into the box provided.
CAPTCHA
Message


MM217
 
Evolution vs. Revolution
Shoshana Friedman I call it the “what happened to my magazine?” response
Up, Up, and Away
Rabbi Moshe Grylak What a fraught subject Eretz Yisrael is, to this day
Where Do You Come From?
Yonoson Rosenblum Could they be IDF officers with no Jewish knowledge?
Heaven Help Us
Eytan Kobre Writing about anti-Semitism should rouse, not soothe
Work/Life Solutions with Chedva Kleinhandler
Moe Mernick “Failures are our compass to success”
An Un-Scientific Survey
Rabbi Emanuel Feldman Are Jerusalemites unfriendly? Not necessarily
Out of Anger
Jacob L. Freedman How Angry Lawyer was finally able to calm down
5 Things You Didn’t Know about…Yitzy Bald
Riki Goldstein He composed his first melody at eight years old
When the Floodgates of Song Open, You’re Never Too Old
Riki Goldstein Chazzan Pinchas Wolf was unknown until three years ago
Who Helped Advance These Popular Entertainers?
Riki Goldstein Unsung deeds that boosted performers into the limelight
Your Task? Ask
Faigy Peritzman A tangible legacy I want to pass on to my children
Are You There?
Sarah Chana Radcliffe Emotional withdrawal makes others feel lonely, abandoned
A Peace of a Whole
Rebbetzin Debbie Greenblatt Love shalom more than you love being right
Seminary Applications
Rabbi Zecharya Greenwald, as told to Ariella Schiller It’s just as hard for seminaries to reject you