Join The Conversation With Mishpacha's Weekly Newsletter

Should I or Shouldn’t I?

Shira Yehudit Djalilmand

Even simple choices aren’t always so simple to make. What’s behind our decisions — and how we can make better ones

Wednesday, June 28, 2017

 Mishpacha image

YES? NO? MAYBE? No one is perfect, and sometimes, despite everything, you’ll make a bad decision. In the perfect scenario, the decision-making process goes something like this: You ascertain the goal you want to achieve, as well as how important it is to you to achieve it. Then you look at your options and decide which one will help you achieve that goal. It sounds so simple. So what goes wrong?

H e leapt onto the stage and grabbed the microphone from the rabbi. He looked out to the crowd. “Bring me a kippah, tzitit, tefillin!” he cried. “I’m ready! I’m doing teshuvah!”

She gazed at the rows of salad dressings staring at her defiantly. So many flavors, each a different price, each with different amounts of sugar, calories, and preservatives. She felt dizzy. How could she possibly decide?

A major decision, made with confidence and determination. And an everyday decision, tiny yet paralyzing. Why do people approach the business of decision-making so differently? Are you born either decisive or a procrastinator, or is it something you learn? And, most importantly, can you do anything to change?

How Do We Decide?

To answer all these questions, first you need to understand a little about how the brain works. In the relatively new field of “decision neuroscience,” researchers are discovering how the actions of neuronal circuits in the brain affect the thousands of decisions you make every day. This sounds frighteningly deterministic. If your thoughts are just a product of brain waves, where is your freedom of choice?

There is actually a lot more to it. Research seems to suggest that the brain uses two separate networks to make decisions: one that determines the risk versus the reward of each choice, and another that guides how you ultimately behave. And in the gap between these two networks lies your freedom to choose, for better or worse. For example, when you go shopping, the brain’s valuation network may tell you to buy only the salad you need for dinner. But then you spot those delicious knishes. The brain’s second network takes over, and suddenly the salad is forgotten and the knishes are in your shopping cart.

Good Enough?

A while back, I went shopping on Rabi Akiva Street in Bnei Brak with my bechor for a black suit for his bar mitzvah. I thought it would be easy — how hard can it be to find a black suit, after all? I was wrong. Oh, so wrong. I hadn’t realized that my beloved son was one of those people who have to check out every single black suit in every shop along the entire length of the street (and Rabi Akiva is a very looooooong street) before coming to a decision. I am not like that. If I find a decent black suit at a decent price, I don’t feel the need to view every other black suit in the country before buying it.


These different approaches to shopping — and decision-making — have official names. Apparently, I’m a “satisficer,” a term coined by economist Herbert Simon in 1956. This is a type of decision-making that “prioritizes an adequate solution over an optimal solution.” Translated, this simply means that “satisficers” will choose something that is “good enough,” even though better options may be out there. That doesn’t mean they choose poor-quality items, only that once they’ve found what they’re looking for, they’re satisfied.

In contrast, “maximizers” — like my son — want to make the best possible decision. That means that even if they find a black suit (or anything else) that fits their requirements, they can’t make a decision until after they’ve examined every option (i.e., every single black suit in Bnei Brak), so they know they’re making the best possible choice.

Of course, some of us may be satisficers most of the time, but when something is particularly important, we may find we have a maximizer side, too. Yet generally, most of us, most of the time, fall into one category or the other. (Excerpted from Family First, Issue 548)

Related Stories

Millennial Millionaire

C. Rosenberg

This generation is not afraid to try something new and daring: Four millennials speak about the busi...

The Immunotherapy Revolution

Miriam A. Knoll, MD

Immunotherapy is changing the face of oncology, giving patients a new way to fight cancer and to liv...

My Backyard

Mishpacha Contributors

Playground. Oasis. Hideaway. Magical Kingdom. Twenty-two women tell of sun and swings, treehouses an...

Share this page with a friend. Fill in the information below, and we'll email your friend a link to this page on your behalf.

Your name
Your email address
You friend's name
Your friend's email address
Please type the characters you see in the image into the box provided.

Top-Down Theory
Shoshana Friedman Our true currency, the accomplishments we value most
Strive for What Binds Us
Yonoson Rosenblum The chareidi community represents something of an oasis
Embracing Victimhood
Eytan Kobre Combating the allure of victimhood
The Kids Are Going to Camp, the Parents Are Going Broke
Miriam Klein Adelman Mindy has to feel good; it doesn’t matter that I feel ba...
Work/Life Solutions with Carlos Wigle
Moe Mernick “Rejection is Hashem’s protection” 
How to Create a Simple 900-Page Novel
Rabbi Emanuel Feldman All of us can reset the titles of our own lives
Stand There or Do Something
Baruch S. Fertel, MD, MPA, FACEP It’s called collaborative care, and it works miracles
I'm Here — Are You Ready?
Riki Goldstein Upbeat and catchy, but still makes listeners think
Back in Time
Riki Goldstein "I wish I could recapture that excitement"
Mixed Messages
Riki Goldstein The unsung craftsmen who give albums their special touch
Go in Peace
Faigy Peritzman Inner peace makes us vessels for blessing
All Work and No Play
Sarah Chana Radcliffe A life only about doing your duties loses all its color
Dying to Believe
With Rav Moshe Wolfson, written by Baila Vorhand Emunah peshutah is the force behind Jewish continuity