Join The Conversation With Mishpacha's Weekly Newsletter

Should I or Shouldn’t I?

Shira Yehudit Djalilmand

Even simple choices aren’t always so simple to make. What’s behind our decisions — and how we can make better ones

Wednesday, June 28, 2017

 Mishpacha image

YES? NO? MAYBE? No one is perfect, and sometimes, despite everything, you’ll make a bad decision. In the perfect scenario, the decision-making process goes something like this: You ascertain the goal you want to achieve, as well as how important it is to you to achieve it. Then you look at your options and decide which one will help you achieve that goal. It sounds so simple. So what goes wrong?

H e leapt onto the stage and grabbed the microphone from the rabbi. He looked out to the crowd. “Bring me a kippah, tzitit, tefillin!” he cried. “I’m ready! I’m doing teshuvah!”

She gazed at the rows of salad dressings staring at her defiantly. So many flavors, each a different price, each with different amounts of sugar, calories, and preservatives. She felt dizzy. How could she possibly decide?

A major decision, made with confidence and determination. And an everyday decision, tiny yet paralyzing. Why do people approach the business of decision-making so differently? Are you born either decisive or a procrastinator, or is it something you learn? And, most importantly, can you do anything to change?

How Do We Decide?

To answer all these questions, first you need to understand a little about how the brain works. In the relatively new field of “decision neuroscience,” researchers are discovering how the actions of neuronal circuits in the brain affect the thousands of decisions you make every day. This sounds frighteningly deterministic. If your thoughts are just a product of brain waves, where is your freedom of choice?

There is actually a lot more to it. Research seems to suggest that the brain uses two separate networks to make decisions: one that determines the risk versus the reward of each choice, and another that guides how you ultimately behave. And in the gap between these two networks lies your freedom to choose, for better or worse. For example, when you go shopping, the brain’s valuation network may tell you to buy only the salad you need for dinner. But then you spot those delicious knishes. The brain’s second network takes over, and suddenly the salad is forgotten and the knishes are in your shopping cart.

Good Enough?

A while back, I went shopping on Rabi Akiva Street in Bnei Brak with my bechor for a black suit for his bar mitzvah. I thought it would be easy — how hard can it be to find a black suit, after all? I was wrong. Oh, so wrong. I hadn’t realized that my beloved son was one of those people who have to check out every single black suit in every shop along the entire length of the street (and Rabi Akiva is a very looooooong street) before coming to a decision. I am not like that. If I find a decent black suit at a decent price, I don’t feel the need to view every other black suit in the country before buying it.


These different approaches to shopping — and decision-making — have official names. Apparently, I’m a “satisficer,” a term coined by economist Herbert Simon in 1956. This is a type of decision-making that “prioritizes an adequate solution over an optimal solution.” Translated, this simply means that “satisficers” will choose something that is “good enough,” even though better options may be out there. That doesn’t mean they choose poor-quality items, only that once they’ve found what they’re looking for, they’re satisfied.

In contrast, “maximizers” — like my son — want to make the best possible decision. That means that even if they find a black suit (or anything else) that fits their requirements, they can’t make a decision until after they’ve examined every option (i.e., every single black suit in Bnei Brak), so they know they’re making the best possible choice.

Of course, some of us may be satisficers most of the time, but when something is particularly important, we may find we have a maximizer side, too. Yet generally, most of us, most of the time, fall into one category or the other. (Excerpted from Family First, Issue 548)

Related Stories

Millennial Millionaire

C. Rosenberg

This generation is not afraid to try something new and daring: Four millennials speak about the busi...

The Immunotherapy Revolution

Miriam A. Knoll, MD

Immunotherapy is changing the face of oncology, giving patients a new way to fight cancer and to liv...

My Backyard

Mishpacha Contributors

Playground. Oasis. Hideaway. Magical Kingdom. Twenty-two women tell of sun and swings, treehouses an...

Share this page with a friend. Fill in the information below, and we'll email your friend a link to this page on your behalf.

Your name
Your email address
You friend's name
Your friend's email address
Please type the characters you see in the image into the box provided.

The Fortunes of War
Rabbi Moshe Grylak We’re still feeling the fallout of the First World War
Some Lessons, But Few Portents
Yonoson Rosenblum What the midterms tell us about 2020
Vote of Confidence
Eyan Kobre Why I tuned in to the liberal radio station
5 out of 10
Rabbi Dovid Bashevkin Top 5 Moments of the Kinus
Day in the Life
Rachel Bachrach Chaim White of KC Kosher Co-op
When Less is More
Rabbi Ron Yitzchok Eisenman How a good edit enhances a manuscript
It’s My Job
Jacob L. Freedman “Will you force me to take meds?”
They’re Still Playing My Song?
Riki Goldstein Yitzy Bald’s Yerav Na
Yisroel Werdyger Can’t Stop Singing
Riki Goldstein Ahrele Samet’s Loi Luni
Double Chords of Hope
Riki Goldstein You never know how far your music can go
Will Dedi Have the Last Laugh?
Dovid N. Golding Dedi and Ding go way back
Battle of the Budge
Faigy Peritzman Using stubbornness to grow in ruchniyus
The Challenging Child
Sarah Chana Radcliffe Strategies for raising the difficult child
Bucking the Trend
Sara Eisemann If I skip sem, will I get a good shidduch?
The Musician: Part 1
D. Himy, M.S. CCC-SLP and Zivia Reischer "If she can't read she'll be handicapped for life!"